Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 06:30

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Wall Street floods into Bitcoin Futures as CME trader count hits all-time high - AMBCrypto
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US - AP News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Mariska Hargitay will reveal past secrets, new family at 'My Mom Jayne' premiere - USA Today
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
RBC Canadian Open 2025 prize money: Full payout from $9.8 million purse - Yahoo Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
ESA signs agreement for potential use of Orbital Reef - SpaceNews
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
4 'Healthy' Trends That Need to Stop Now, According to a Dietitian - EatingWell